Chapter #24

Dr. Rife's RF Method or the EMF Method?

Dr. Rife’s RF or Radio Frequency method has been used with plasma tube instruments from the 1920s until today. The contact metal electrodes or metal hand-cylinder method that does NOT use the RF or radiofrequency method has been used from 1957 to the present day. The contact RF or radiofrequency method that uses metal hand-cylinders has been used since 2001 to the present day. With the building of the no RF 1957 contact instrument by John Crane, and John Marsh there began the false belief that the high RF frequencies and RF carrier frequency method used by Dr. Rife weren’t really needed because all of Dr. Rife’s RF or radio frequencies were actually only audio frequencies.
               
Because of this false belief that all of Dr. Rife’s radio frequencies were actually audio frequencies, a few people back in the 1990s came up with a new idea of substituting the EMF or “Electro-Magnetic Field” method for the RF or radiofrequency method. The new EMF method does not use any RF frequencies or RF carrier frequency but uses high voltage coils to light the plasma gas in the Ray Tube. This new method also creates a very high “Electro-Magnetic Field” which has the capability of carrying the audio frequencies into the user. This field is the same high “Electro-Magnetic Field” that microwaves and high voltage electrical lines create, and which many people today are very concerned about. What most people do not understand is the RF method and the EMF method are two completely different delivery methods that work on different principles. Dr. Rife only used the RF or Radio Frequency method exclusively and all of his original microorganism frequencies, but two, were in the Radio Frequency band. The EMF or “Electro-Magnetic Field” method cannot output any RF radio frequencies because this method is limited to a maximum audio frequency range of about 20,000 Hertz. All of the EMF plasma machines available on the market output up to 10,000 Hertz, with only one capable of 20,000 Hertz. Because of this limit, this method cannot output even one of Dr. Rife's original RF radio frequencies that he used in his original 1920’s/1950’s machines. Many people have legitimately wondered how a machine that cannot output any of Dr. Rife’s original RF frequencies, or use his RF method, can be a real Rife Machine? The answer to that question is, all EMF machines are not real Rife Machines. No EMF instrument builder likes this fact, but this will not change the truth. This Rife machine report was written to give the truth about Dr. Rife’s machines and the methods he used.

Anyone looking to purchase a machine will find that there are many so-called “Rife Machines” on the market that use a plasma tube. Those that are not RF plasma Ray tube instruments are called EM or EMF plasma Ray tube instruments. The person purchasing the instrument needs to specifically ask which method is used because those who sell EMF machines usually will not tell you that their instrument is an EMF machine that cannot output any of Dr. Rife’s RF radio frequencies. For the remainder of this chapter, we will call Dr. Rife’s method the RF method and the other the EMF method.

Today all of the RF and EMF machines use the square wave waveform which started with the original 1936 Rife Ray #5 machine covered in chapter 9 of this report. But the Rife Ray #5 did not work on square wave harmonics, it worked on the “Harmonic Sideband Method.” Harmonic sidebands are completely different than square wave harmonics. The harmonic sidebands method requires the use of an RF carrier frequency because the harmonic sidebands are produced from the RF carrier frequency. This harmonic sidebands method was proven to work in Dr. Rife’s laboratory when the machine was built and tested in 1936. The Rife Ray #5 design was the only instrument design that has ever been sold to doctors. The 1950s AZ-58 was also this same design. An EMF instrument design cannot produce harmonic sidebands because they use no RF carrier frequency. The EMF design is completely dependent on square wave harmonics. Because of the use of the square wave waveform, it is implied by those who build EMF instruments that the EMF method can produce all of Dr. Rife's high RF frequencies through square wave harmonics that are produced from using the square wave waveform.

We will now discuss in more depth how square wave harmonics work. The square wave waveform produces harmonics that can go up as many as about 25 harmonic steps or higher before the power level reaches zero when measured with a spectrum analyzer. It is the power output capability of an instrument that determines how much power is in the square wave harmonics. Because of these harmonics, some manufacturers state that the square wave waveform can produce infinite harmonics that can reach any frequency, but this kind of statement is false. Yes, a square wave waveform can produce infinite harmonics, but only if you have infinite power, which is not possible. For this reason, in the real world, there is no such thing as infinite harmonics when using a square wave. Because of this fact, these harmonics drop off in power due to the power drop in each harmonic step. This simple fact is not explained so people get an incorrect understanding of how these square wave harmonics actually work. If you look at the photo below of a spectrum analyzer graph you can see how the power drops in each harmonic step. Notice after 17 harmonic steps using a 300 Hertz frequency the power level has dropped down to the yellow zero line, where there is no power left in the harmonics. RF harmonic sidebands work differently than square wave harmonics since they are closer to the desired RF devitalizing M.O.R frequency, and this method was proven to work on microorganisms in Dr. Rife’s laboratory.

 

The above graph, on the left, shows that a square wave frequency can produce Even and Odd harmonics. Think of harmonics as “other frequencies” that are created from the fundamental frequency. In the above graph, on the right, you can see how the power level (Amplitude or dBc) drops in each square wave harmonic. Number 1 is the fundamental frequency at full amplitude or 1.000. Number 3 is the first of the odd harmonics and it only has 1/3rd (0.333) the power in it that the fundamental frequency has. In just eight odd harmonics at number 17, there is only 1/17th (0.058) of the power level of the fundamental frequency. Now, if the even harmonics were included in the graph then number 2 would have 1/2 (0.500) the power, number 4 would have 1/4th (0.250) the power, and number 18 would have 1/18th (0.055) the power in it. This demonstrates how quickly the power drops in the harmonics of a square wave frequency.

Above is a graph showing a 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% square wave duty cycle. With a 50% square wave duty cycle only odd harmonics are created. But if you use a higher duty cycle than 50%, such as 60% to 100% then both odd and even harmonics are created. Also, you will notice in the graph below that the higher the duty cycle the greater the “Average Voltage” or “Average Power” output will be in the waveform. This is due to the On and Off time of the frequency. Off time is the amount of power that is lost when it is turned off.  A 100% duty cycle has 100% of the power output in it, and a 75% duty cycle has 75% of the power output in it. The higher the duty cycle, the greater the power output in the square wave waveform. Below is a link to a video that shows how the square wave harmonics work including the odd harmonics that are created from a 50% square wave duty cycle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC36AqL5mw8

The problem with using low audio frequencies to try and reach Dr. Rife’s high RF frequencies through square wave harmonics is if there is not enough power in the harmonic frequency then it will not resonate with the organism. In order to fully understand this square wave harmonic frequency power loss, we will give a simple explanation using two of Dr. Rife’s lowest radio frequencies for Anthrax and Streptothrix. Anthrax is 139,200 Hertz and Streptothrix is 192,000 Hertz. We will use the highest frequency below 10,000 Hertz to give it the lowest number of square wave harmonics to hit Dr. Rife’s original frequency. Below are two photos of the harmonic calculator we used. The photo, below on the left, is for Anthrax and 9,280 Hertz was used for the calculation. It is the 27th harmonic or 13th odd harmonic that hits the original frequency of 139,200 Hertz. The photo, below on the right, is for Streptothrix and 9,142.85 Hertz was used for that calculation. It is the 21st harmonic or 10th odd harmonic that hit the original frequency of 191,999.85 Hertz (192,000). The calculator we used is at this link.

http://mustcalculate.com/electronics/harmonics.php?f=300

Now let’s take a look at the power level in these square wave harmonic frequencies. Because Anthrax is at the 15th harmonic it only has 1/15th of the power output of the Fundamental frequency of 9,280 Hertz. Streptothrix is at the 21st harmonic and only has 1/21st of the power output of the Fundamental frequency of 9,142.85 Hertz. The Rife Ray #5 power output was 75-watts. If we divide the 75-watts by 15 we get 5-watts in the Anthrax square wave harmonic frequency of 139,200 Hertz. With Streptothrix we would divide the 75-watts by 21 and that gives us 3.57-watts in that square wave harmonic frequency of 192,000 Hertz. Keep in mind that these are Dr. Rife’s two lowest RF frequencies. When Dr. Rife first started testing frequencies with his plasma tube instrument the power level was only 8 to 10-watts output and this power level was only used for testing microorganisms under the slide of the microscope. The BX cancer virus frequency is the 161st harmonic of 9,962.73 Hertz and if you divide 75-watts by 161 you get 0.46-watts in the square wave harmonic of 1,604,000 Hertz. The BY cancer virus is the 169th harmonic of 9,053.25 Hertz and if you divide 75-watts by 169 you get 0.44-watts in the square wave harmonic of 1,530,000 Hertz. This why the EMF method of producing Dr. Rife’s original RF or radio frequencies using square wave harmonic frequencies will not work as claimed because the number of harmonics is too great a number. Unless people have this understanding they will not be able to make the correct decision when purchasing a machine. If a machine cannot produce Dr. Rife’s frequencies through the proven RF method using a direct Fundamental frequency or through the harmonic sideband method its ability to devitalize a microorganism is very limited.

Because of how power is lost in the square wave harmonics no one should believe that an EMF instrument will work like Dr. Rife's high RF machines. If this method would have worked Dr. Rife could have used it because it would have been a lot easier to build this type of instrument. But this was not the case. People should be aware that no EMF machine can ever produce all of Dr. Rife's original high RF frequencies through square wave harmonics regardless of what is claimed. They can produce some of his frequencies which are less than about 500,000 Hertz by using this square wave harmonic method but above 500,000 Hertz it becomes very questionable. Because of these limitations EMF machines cannot output all of Dr. Rife's RF frequencies or work on his RF method of delivering the frequencies in the ranges he used. For most people, the sole purpose of purchasing a so-called "Rife Machine" is to be able to use the same method and frequencies Dr. Rife used. For these reasons, the RF method is the only method anyone would want to use. Click on the link below to read several written reports of doctors who used Dr. Rife’s original Rife Machines and frequencies on their many patients.

https://rifevideos.com/doctors_who_used_the_rife_machine_on_their
patients.html

Some EMF instrument builders also imply that the EMF method produces 100 times more power output than the RF method Dr. Rife used. If you are only comparing the EMF field to the RF field method then this may be correct. But this is not a correct comparison. Dr. Rife only used the RF method and it only outputs a very low safe EMF field. For this reason, there is no way to compare an EMF ray tube instrument to an RF ray tube instrument. Even though it is impossible to compare these two methods some EMF machine builders do it anyway and try to represent the EMF method, without any proof, as superior to the RF method Dr. Rife used. They try to put the RF method in the most negative inferior light they can, even though this was the only method Dr. Rife and the many doctors used.

Here are several statements that have been made in order to try and convince people that this EMF method is better than Dr. Rife's RF method. A comment will be made after each quote showing how misleading this information is:

(1.) "We are not trying to replicate the past; rather we are engineering the future!"

How can you engineer “the future” if you do not use the proven RF method that was used in the past? Certainly, it is possible to replicate the past in a more modern machine using the RF method used by Dr. Rife and there are companies that have done this using RF carrier frequencies along with the ability to output Dr. Rife's high RF frequencies. It should be said that it is scientifically impossible to engineer “the future" using the EMF delivery method because Dr. Rife’s RF fundamental frequencies cannot be produced directly by using the EMF method.

(2.) "We do not use a carrier wave as promoted by some manufacturers. Their output is so poor (often 1/100th of our output) that they use these waves to try to get deeper penetration."

According to this statement, they say that the RF method Dr. Rife used is a "poor" method to use. Does this make any logical sense? How can Dr. Rife's RF method be a "poor" method? All radio stations broadcast using an RF carrier frequency and without it, radio and all methods of broadcast communication would not be possible. All of the great accomplishments Dr. Rife obtained only came from the use of the RF method. This is a scientific fact that cannot be changed. All but two of his original frequencies were RF frequencies. The RF method with its low EMF field would only be a "poor" method if you are incorrectly comparing it to the high EMF field method. The RF method naturally has a low electromagnetic field and the EMF method naturally has a high electromagnetic field. These are two completely different methods of delivering frequencies. The RF method, using an RF carrier frequency and high RF frequencies, covers Dr. Rife's complete frequency ranges. Comparing these two methods is like comparing apples and oranges. Dr. Rife's high RF frequencies and his RF carrier frequency method gave deep penetration otherwise it never would have worked. Dr. Rife’s machines had more than a thirty foot radius range all around the instrument. The proof of this is the fact that the RF method was the only method that would devitalize microorganisms. Certainly Dr. Rife knew what he was doing and this is why he used the SUPERIOR RF method which is NOT a "poor" limited method.

(3.) "Some manufacturers often have very weak devices that use a carrier wave because their instruments are 12v based and use hand cylinders. Others have chosen to run a carrier wave because this is what was done in the 1930s."

Notice in this quote they fully understand that Dr. Rife used the RF “carrier wave” method but they believe they are smarter than Dr. Rife and fully reject his RF method. Just because a manufacturer uses an RF carrier wave does not mean the instrument is a "very weak device". Even though some instruments may use 9 to 24-volt power supplies with metal hand-cylinders they can output power levels from 1-watt to almost 20-watts. They also have the ability to output voltages from about 30 volts to over 200 volts. The current is limited with these instruments so that they stay within safe power levels. These power ranges are certainly not "weak" when used in direct contact with the user. It is not what power level goes into a machine that makes it powerful but what comes out that is important. There are many metal hand-cylinder instruments that only output about 1/5th (0.20) of 1-watt and these are greatly limited and underpowered. But it is the use of an RF Carrier frequency including high RF frequencies that has made it possible to increase power levels to about the 20-watt power range for metal hand-cylinder instruments. Also, the reason that some have chosen to use an RF carrier frequency is to replicate what Dr. Rife did in the 1930s. Since this was the only method proven by Dr. Rife to work, it stands to reason this would be the preferred method to use. Using any other method probably would not be wise if you are really trying to do what Dr. Rife was able to do. Anyone can see that just because they use 9 to 24-volt power supplies does not mean they are "very weak devices” when they can output 4 to about 20-watts.

(4.) "Other researchers have drawn similar conclusions as regards to carrier waves being unnecessary as long as the device has sufficient output. The effectiveness of any instrument is demonstrated by the results."

When they say “other researchers have drawn similar conclusions” only means they are making the same mistake others have made. Since there have been no other researchers that have done what Dr. Rife did then any conclusions that an RF carrier wave is unnecessary are only the incorrect conclusions of those who do not want to use Dr. Rife's original RF method. This is just an attempt to justify using the EMF method instead of using Dr. Rife's proven RF method. "Sufficient output" using the EMF method does not mean it is a better method. Power is important and Dr. Rife used power levels from 50-watts to about 500-watts with his RF instruments. The1936/1939 Rife Ray #5 or Beam Ray Clinical instrument was the only instrument sold to the public and doctors. It had a power output of 75-watts. These same power levels are used today in RF Ray tube instruments and they have greater penetration than any EMF Ray tube instruments regardless of what may be claimed by EMF instrument builders. "The effectiveness of any instrument is demonstrated by the results." This is why Dr. Rife's RF method is the only method he found that would devitalize microorganisms. Any other conclusions are only misguided "conclusions" from those who are trying to replace Dr. Rife's RF method with the inferior EMF method.

(5.) "We do not use Sine waves (we use Square wave conversion) with our device since these do not generate harmonics to reach the higher range RF frequencies."

The reason EMF machines do not use the sine wave waveform is due to the fact that they cannot output frequencies higher than about 20,000 Hertz. This limited frequency range is the lower audio frequency range which is not the RF radio frequency range Dr. Rife used on pathogenic microorganisms. Dr. Rife used sine wave frequencies because he used the higher RF range. Sine waves do not produce harmonics and they would never work correctly with an EMF instrument. But as we pointed out the square wave waveform cannot produce real power in harmonics strong enough to have any real effect in "the higher range" of "RF frequencies." Using the square wave harmonic method to hit Dr. Rife’s “higher range RF frequencies” is just wishful thinking. Square wave harmonics using low audio frequencies works ok up to about 500,000 Hertz to hit Dr. Rife’s higher RF frequencies but you must have at least 75-watts of power to do this. Power in waveforms is very important using this method and the below power in waveforms graph demonstrates this fact. Keep in mind that the Rife Ray #4 used a damped wave with about 500-watts output. The waveform changed to a square wave waveform with the Rife Ray #5. The power in a damped waveform is only about 11% but a square wave waveform can go as high as 100%, but the Rife Ray #5 only used a 50% duty cycle. This made its power level in its waveform comparable to the Rife Ray #4.

(6.) "Oscilloscope readings of our systems output will reveal a proprietary waveform specific to our research and development, and should not be confused with other manufacturer's claims as regards so-called "Correct Wave Form."

The EMF waveform is not “a proprietary waveform” and is a natural result of using this method with a square-wave waveform. Dr. Rife only used damped, sine and square waves in his instruments. The high RF sine wave waveform was gated or pulsed with a low audio frequency and this produced harmonics in the sine wave waveform used. Since these are the only three waveforms Dr. Rife used, then any other unproven "proprietary waveform" would not be wise to use. This is the reason that manufacturers prefer to use the "Correct Wave Forms" that Dr. Rife's original machines used. All other so-called "proprietary waveforms" other than damped, sine and square waves are unproven waveforms and are only used as "Sales Hype" by manufacturers.

As can be seen by these six quotes people can easily be confused by all the incorrect information being written by some who promote the EMF method as superior to Dr. Rife’s RF method. Again we will state there is nothing wrong with EMF machines as long as people understand this is not the method Dr. Rife used and they are not real “Rife Machines” as they claim. These quotes show how the Rife industry is full of negative advertising along with inaccurate comparison charts of different machines. There is not one comparison chart that we have seen that has 100% accurate information on it. So be careful not to believe everything written in them.

Below is a chart similar to a chart an EMF company made. In their chart, they compare their EMF instrument to other EMF instruments, including RF instruments. Because they used their own name and the names of other instruments we will use those names also in this discussion. We have already shown there is no way to accurately compare EMF to RF since they are two completely different methods of delivering frequencies. Because of this fact, most of the information in this chart is incorrect and misleading. You will notice in this first chart that there is no real distinction showing if a frequency generator is an RF method or an EMF method frequency instrument. Only one machine has “RF Devices” after it. Also in this chart, you see a distance measurement of 1 inch, 3 inches and 6 inches after some of the machines. This measurement represents how strong the EMF field is when they supposedly measured it. Most of this measurement information is not correct with these instruments. Since there is a real concern about the dangers of high EMF fields having a 10 foot high EMF field is nothing to brag about. Having a low safe EMF field like Dr. Rife’s RF method produces is what every manufacturer should really want with their instrument.

The first machine on this chart is a 20MHz (20 million Hertz) frequency range contact type instrument that people use metal hand-cylinder and footplates with. It is the most powerful contact hand-cylinder and footplate instrument on the market with a 4.7-watt RF output. They also have a 15-watt contact amplifier and a 20 to 190-watt plasma tube amplifier which is a replica of the Rife Ray #5 with a 20MHz frequency range. It has an over 40-foot range. The second instrument is a 120-watt RF plasma tube instrument that has a 30-foot range with a 300,000 Hertz frequency range. The third instrument is an EMF plasma tube instrument with a 10,000 Hertz audio frequency range. The fourth instrument uses metal hand-cylinders and hand-held ray tubes. It has a 4MHz frequency range and claims to output 30-watts to the hand-held ray tubes but measures less than 1-watt output with a wattmeter. The fifth instrument uses a large coil to produce a very high EMF field. Its audio frequency range is only about 1000 Hertz but is incredibly powerful. The sixth and final instrument is an EMF plasma tube machine that claims to be a “True Rife Machine” but it is not one. It uses one of the highest, if not the highest, EMF fields. It only has a 10,000 Hertz frequency range. We made this chart after looking at their chart.

In a youtube video, they talk about how they used a TriField Meter to test the electromagnetic field of their instrument. Then they use this information and claim that the EMF method they use is superior to Dr. Rife’s RF method. Because of this incorrect information, many people are misled by the use of a TriField Meter test. The link below is to their video where they make these incorrect EMF claims and we recommend that you watch it. You will also notice that the comments section on the video is disabled. This is due to the fact that they do not want people to post comments that could give a correct understanding of the RF method compared to the EMF method showing how most of their statements in the video are incorrect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFyUO4ZdGhU

If you watched the video then you know they talked a lot about a TriField Meter. Using a TriField Meter is an accurate method of measuring an electromagnetic field when you are comparing one EMF instrument to another EMF instrument. But it is not an accurate method of reading any RF instrument's true power output or penetration capability. If it was an accurate method of determining how Dr. Rife's machine really worked then his machine, which had a very low EMF field, would have never devitalized any microorganisms. If this was the case then no one would be interested in purchasing a "Rife Machine" today. This is not rocket science, just simple logic. The next chart, shown below, is a more accurate comparison of the instruments. You will notice in this corrected chart that all of the instruments are listed as using either the EMF or RF method. You will also notice that the EMF field only matters if the instrument is compared to another EMF instrument. All of the RF-based instruments have low EMF fields. If the “TrueRife” machine really buries the TriField at 10 feet as they claim this makes a microwave oven’s EMF field look small. Anyone concerned with high EMF fields would be very concerned about this high EMF field level. Besides this, it cannot output even one of Rife’s original frequencies.

Since the "Radiant Energy Output" of an EMF instrument cannot be correctly compared to the "Radiant Energy Output" of an RF instrument then the EMF method of comparison will always be misleading and incorrect. You will also notice, in the above chart, that the "Radiant Energy Output" of the various RF instruments can extend as far as 30-feet or more distance depending on the power output of the instrument. With even greater power it can actually go from 40 to 60-feet. The distance of how the RF field really works is far beyond the capabilities of any EMF instrument. This is why, in the chart on the previous page, the "Radiant Energy Comparison" is very misleading. Dr. Rife's machine could devitalize an organism, under observation, on the slide of his microscope within several hundred feet using his RF method and frequencies. At this distance, no TriField Meter would read any EMF field. But when it came to inside the body he always used the plasma or ray tube within two feet of his test animals. This is due to the fact that the body has impedance or resistance and it takes more energy for penetration. At two feet Dr. Rife's ray tube had a very strong EMF field but the EMF field was not a factor in devitalizing microorganisms otherwise the frequencies would not have worked for several hundred feet. Because Dr. Rife was always concerned about penetration the doctors who used his equipment always put the plasma tube as close as they could to the patient for the best possible results.

What must be kept in mind is the EMF method has never been proven to devitalize any of Dr. Rife’s microorganisms under microscope observation due to the fact that the EMF method cannot output Dr. Rife's original RF frequencies since all of his frequencies are all RF or radio frequencies. If an EMF machine could output Dr. Rife's high RF fundamental frequencies then it would not be an EMF instrument, it would be an RF instrument. Dr. Rife said he worked in his laboratory for more than thirty years and tested many methods but he found that only the high RF method would resonate and devitalize pathogenic microorganisms. The idea that high RF frequencies or a carrier wave are un-necessary denies the whole method Dr. Rife used. Because Dr. Rife's method of using RF had a low “Electro-Magnetic Field” compared to the EMF method, most of the EMF type instruments have limited their “Electro-Magnetic Fields” within reasonable levels. But the TrueRife company claims in their videos that they have increased their “Electro-Magnetic Field” as high as “1 million times” greater than Dr. Rife's RF instrument could output. Below is a link to the video that has their “1 million times” greater Electro-Magnetic Field” output claim.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe6UUbJ72a4

The real problem with the EMF method is they want to rate all RF plasma tube instruments by the EMF standard rather than by the original RF standard used by Dr. Rife. They do this as though they are more knowledgeable than he was. Using the EMF method is not a position of strength as they believe, but in reality, it is a position of weakness. An EMF instrument could be a thousand or even “1 million times” more powerful than an RF instrument and it would not make any difference because the EMF method is a completely different method of applying frequencies than Dr. Rife’s RF method which he used. Even Dr. Rife was concerned about too much power with his RF instruments. He limited the power of his instruments to levels of 500-watts or less. The only machine sold to doctors or the public was the Rife Ray #5 and it had a power level of 75-watts and the EMF field was very low. Here is Dr. Rife's quote showing his concern about the use of too much power:

DR. RIFE: “Now this outfit here - the way we have it boosted up here now with an extreme lot of power behind the actual output that is coming out of the thing...I wouldn’t want to use this - or I wouldn’t want to use this instrument here the way it is souped up there for this saltwater proposition to TREAT A PATIENT with.”

DR. GONIN: “No.”

DR. RIFE: “You can get BEYOND THE LIMIT [power levels in excess of 500 watts].”

DR. GONIN: “YES, quite.”

JOHN CRANE: “That’s what Dr. Yale did. You see, he stepped it up and up and up…” (1950’s Gonin, Rife, Crane and Marsh Paper #27-32).

If Dr. Rife was concerned about the power levels of his instruments then this indicates that you can use too much power even with the RF method he used. The higher the power level the greater the EMF field. From Dr. Rife's statement and what we know about EMF fields, it makes one wonder about the wisdom of using high “Electro-Magnetic fields” up to “1 million times” greater than Dr. Rife used. We will leave it up to the reader to decide if they think high “Electro-Magnetic Fields” are harmless. More is not always better. What people need to understand is a high EMF field would be important if Dr. Rife used this method, but he did not. The promotion of using a high EMF field just misleads people into the belief that Dr. Rife used this method. The idea that Dr. Rife's low EMF instruments were inferior to high EMF instruments is a false concept especially when these instruments cannot output any of Dr. Rife's original fundamental frequencies. The promotion of a High Electro-Magnetic Field should be seen for what it really is, "Sales Hype".

There is a great deal of information available on the internet showing that extremely high “Electro-Magnetic Fields” may not be safe to use. We suggest the reader of this report do a search on this subject and learn more about this subject so they can make wise decisions.

Chapter Summary: The Electro-Magnetic Field method  or EMF method of delivering frequencies is not the method Dr. Rife used to devitalize or render harmless pathogenic microorganisms. He used the RF or Radio Frequency method and all but 2 of his original frequencies were radio frequencies. The low square wave harmonic audio frequency method of producing Dr. Rife’s frequencies will only work with a few of his original frequencies because the power level in square wave harmonics drops down very quickly with each harmonic. The power output level of any instrument using the square wave harmonic method depends on whether it uses the RF method or just the low audio range without any RF. The greater the power output the better it will work. An RF instrument that uses an RF carrier frequency can deliver hundreds, if not thousands, of times more power than just an audio frequency instrument that uses no RF carrier frequency. Power determines performance. The EMF method is limited to about 20,000 Hertz and these frequencies are all audio frequencies. This EMF method works on using a very high “Electro-Magnetic Field” to deliver the frequencies. This very high “Electro-Magnetic Field” is the same electromagnetic field that high voltage lines and microwave ovens produce that many people have concerns about. To avoid this potential problem Dr. Rife’s RF method produces very low EMF fields and is safer to use. 

Chapter 25, will be a summary of the "Rife Machine Report."